On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 12:05:44PM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote: > On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Ilari Liusvaara <[email protected]> > wrote: > > It seems ACKs work in terms of RSNs. This generates a weirdness that > > a fragment can be known with multiple IDs, in case a packet gets > > delayed enough to trigger retransmission but the original is then > > accepted. But OTOH, retransmission at fragment granularity is useful > > with potentially "obese" messages like Certificate. > > > > This is the calculation I made as well. Note that removing aliasing in this > fashion actually is useful in measuring packet loss (this is what QUIC > does).
IMO, since handshake only occurs once per connection and DTLS needs to be implemented on all kinds of constrained devices (on both client and server sides), simplicity is more important than performance. Also, packet loss estimates do not seem useful: There are far too few packets to get useful statistics. -Ilari _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
