On Friday, July 07, 2017 11:14:10 am Salz, Rich wrote: > On Thursday, July 06, 2017 10:01:08 pm Dave Garrett wrote: > > Just as a clarification, all new RFCs should ideally meet all of the > > following > > criteria: > > * AEAD only > > * PFS only > > * TLS 1.2 and 1.3 support > > * no TLS 1.0 or 1.1 support (let alone SSL) > > * no use of broken hashes (MD5, SHA1, etc.) > > That's a good idea. > > Want to throw together a quick draft for curdle or AD-sponsored SAAG?
I was just enumerating the points that seem to have a general consensus in this WG and come up each time a new doc is discussed. I was going for FAQ, not RFC. ;) That said, if we think there could be an actual benefit to formalizing this, probably with more detail (such as in Ilari's follow-up), that would be something I'd support. Dave _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
