> ... the IESG could also decline to allow such a WG item to > get published.
That’s what I’d expect and hope for. > Better skip the Q/A at the WG meeting -- it makes no difference as to > determining consensus, +1 > and no one needs the other side screaming bloody > murder and judging one a moron or evil. I thought the judgment has already been made? ;-) P.S. I assume the “or” above is an “inclusive or”? ;-) _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
