I was at at least one of those presentations recently, and while it certainly convinced me that there was a problem in the short term, it did not convince me that the points you are making are inherent problems with the technology. That is, the problem is not that there is no way to achieve what you intend without static keys, but rather that it would be difficult in the context of some existing deployed architectures to achieve what you intend without static keys. I agree that this is a problem.
On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Dobbins, Roland <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Jul 15, 2017, at 16:05, Dobbins, Roland <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > There is plenty of information on these topics available on the Internet > today. > > At the risk of self-replying, it should also be noted that highly > informative discussions of these challenges, & detailed presentations > thereof, have taken place in WG meetings at previous IETF meetings. > > There has also been ample time since those discussions & presentations to > gain additional understanding & insight. > > ----------------------------------- > Roland Dobbins <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
