On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 04:25:38PM +0000, Tony Putman wrote: > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > > So basically triple-DH. > > > > As with any new mode, it would require security analysis (which is not > > exactly simple). > > Thanks for the keyword, Ilari: I've now found > http://ieee-security.org/TC/SP2015/papers-archived/6949a232.pdf which > talks about triple-DH. I'll read up some more on it and see if there's > a reasonable security analysis.
Sorry, I was unclear. I didn't mean security analysis of Triple DH in general, but security analysis of triple DH as embedded to TLS. -Ilari _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
