Hiya,

On 05/11/17 13:09, Ted Lemon wrote:
> Consensus isn't about number of votes. However, I think we can say that
> although there seems to be some interest in making sure this use case is
> addressed, there are known ways of addressing it, and little interest in
> inventing a new way that weakens a new feature of tls 1.3

Don't disagree. In addition there's always been folks in the
rough when it comes to any security BCP or similar and ISTM
that the breaking-TLS case is no different - there'll always
be people who (mistakenly IMO) perceive that it'd be better
to break TLS (and prioritise their particular concern) than
it is do our best to improve Internet security and privacy
overall. (That's one reason the chairs' question in Prague
wasn't a good one - it will always be the case that there are
IETFers who do want to break TLS and similar - we learned
nothing from that hum at all.)

As a meta-comment, I think it's really a pity that most or
all such break-TLS proposals appear to be accompanied (not
necessarily from draft authors) by bad argument, overstatement
and ignoring the existence of downsides. (*) IMO that is yet
another indicator that those arguing to break TLS know that
they're likely to end up in the rough and hence at tempted
to attempt the "hard-sell" (as you Ted I think called it,
perhaps too generously) which is I think disruptive to WG
progress.

So I'd argue to not bother discussing this bad idea again at
IETF-100 - it's consumed enough cycles already and we won't
learn anything at all if we do waste time in that way yet
again.

S.

(*) I fully admit to meeting such bad argument with robust
argument and will continue doing so:-)

> 
> On Nov 5, 2017 14:03, "Salz, Rich" <rs...@akamai.com> wrote:
> 
>> So if the only people in favor of it are the draft authors, then we have
>> consensus, right?
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TLS mailing list
>> TLS@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to