I already have a conflict for this, so I will not be attending. -Ekr
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:57 AM, Darin Pettis <dpp.e...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sean - thank you for the update and options on rooms. > > Ben and Brett - which room should we meet in? > > Initially opposed to encrypting SNI as it appears to break many services > that utilize it but curious to hear more. Thx > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:17 AM Christian Huitema <huit...@huitema.net> > wrote: > >> On 11/12/2017 4:54 PM, Sean Turner wrote: >> >> > Hi! I applaud the initiative for suggesting the hangout [0]. >> Squatting in that room ought to be okay but in case the secretariat ends up >> scheduling another IETF session in that room the 12 person room >> (Butterworth) is still available during that time: >> > https://www.ietf.org/registration/MeetingWiki/wiki/ >> doku.php?id=100sidemeetings2 >> > It can be scheduled through the following link: >> > https://ietf.org/meeting/amreq.html >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > spt >> > >> > [0] For those more process oriented folks, Ben and Bret correctly >> identified this as a hangout. it’s not a WG session that got canceled. >> > >> >> The SNI Encryption draft is maintained on the TLS WG Github, at >> https://github.com/tlswg/sniencryption. It would be really nice if after >> or during the discussions someone opened issues and possibly PR. >> >> Thanks, and sorry I could not join you in Singapore >> >> -- Christian Huitema >> >> _______________________________________________ >> TLS mailing list >> TLS@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >> > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
