> I'm not sure I agree renumbering is the right reaction, though I don't > object to > that. This could be a case where it's overall better that those specific > devices > suffer breakage, and hopefully then do get firmware updated to support > TLS1.3 or TLS-without-extended-random-or-dual-ec > at some point.
It's never better to break large numbers of things, if it can be avoided at low cost. The reaction isn't going to be "TLS 1.3 broke my printer, it's time to upgrade my firmware.", it's going to be "TLS 1.3 broke my printer, which was working perfectly fine. TLS 1.3 is bad. I wonder what else they got wrong. People shouldn't use TLS 1.3." -Tim
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
