Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-tls-dnssec-chain-extension-06: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-dnssec-chain-extension/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I am happy to see this published, but have a few minor comments: - I agree with Alexey's comments. -3.4: "If the TLSA record set was synthesized by a DNS wildcard, the chain must include the signed NSEC or NSEC3 records that prove that there was no explicit match of the TLSA record name and no closer wildcard match." Should that "must" be a "MUST"? - Nit in Authors List: Unless I've missed something, Richard's affiliation is no longer current. (I only point it out in case it's an oversight; I have no objection if it's that way on purpose.) _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
