> -----Original Message-----
> From: ilariliusva...@welho.com [mailto:ilariliusva...@welho.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 9:18 AM
> To: Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com>
> Cc: 'Martin Thomson' <martin.thom...@gmail.com>; firstname.lastname@example.org; draft-ietf-
> Subject: Re: [TLS] Mail regarding draft-ietf-tls-record-limit
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 08:31:53AM -0800, Jim Schaad wrote:
> > Martin,
> > I think that the wording I would prefer would be along the lines of
> > A server MUST NOT error on the value of the extension when a higher
> > TLS version is requested. The server MUST use the minimum of the
> > requested value and the maximum value for the TLS version negotiated.
> > A server MAY error if a the value of the extension is exceeded for the
> > version of TLS requested.
> You need to consider the case where there is some unknown-to-server
> extension that happens to alter the limit.
I am not sure how, as a that server, I could possibly do that. I can't act on
something I don't understand.
TLS mailing list