On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 7:32 AM, Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]> wrote: > To expound a bit more on my thinking, pss_pss is what we actually want > people to be using, thus it should be Recommended, but pss_rsae is what > people are actually going to be using (to large extent), and that is > still a deployment that we consider good and useful, for now. Maybe in > 5 years the IESG can change those "yes"es to "no"s, of course.
I think that I agree. For recommendations PSS is fine. If the question is MTI, then I think we're stuck with pss_rsae. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
