> If your consortium want a multi-party security protocol that does not affect 
> other folks' security as you seem to claim, then that is the obvious route to 
> explore.

+1. It seems that this is at the core of the request. In which case the proper 
solution is to define this multi-party protocol, not to modify TLS for this 
purpose.

Cheers,

Andrei
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to