Doesn’t IETF have a liaison process that is used to work with other standards bodies? And the bigger question, since the ask is essentially for a multi-party security protocol: Is TLS WG the right place to discuss this?
Cheers, Andrei From: TLS <tls-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Russ Housley Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 10:29 AM To: IETF TLS <tls@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS@IETF101 Agenda Posted * >> Nalini, why don't you (the consortium) define the standard, then? > Indeed, if a “TLS13-visibility” standard has to be defined, it would make > sense for the consortium (rather than the TLS WG) to define it. In fact, my mistake that was caught by Martin is exactly the reason that we want the experts in the TLS WG to review the document. Russ
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
