Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-tls-dnssec-chain-extension-07: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-dnssec-chain-extension/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Now that TLS 1.3 is approved for publication, I think adding a Normative Reference to TLS 1.3 is no brainer. I am clearing my DISCUSS on the assumption that this would be fixed before publication of the RFC. 1) TLS 1.3 needs to be a normative reference, but it is not even listed in References. 2) The first mention of NSEC3 need a normative reference. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
