> On Mar 22, 2018, at 10:10, Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sean Turner <[email protected]> writes: > >> I had a quick chat with the iANA folks about the HashAlgorithm and >> SignatureAlgorithm, which we are effectively closing by marking all >> unregistered bits as either reserved or depcreated. IANA suggested another >> way which is to just close the registry, > > This seems a bit of a strange thing to do, if it's going to be closed as soon > as the RFC is published then why have it? A registry implies you can register > things in it, while this will be just a publication of existing values with no > ability to register new ones. If it's that then it's a List of Algorithm IDs, > not a Registry.
Peter, I think you’re saying that once the registries are closed we don’t call them registries? I think I can get the registry title to be: TLS HashAlgorithm - Registry Closed spt _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
