On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Adam Roach <a...@nostrum.com> wrote:
>>> A server MUST NOT enforce this restriction; a client might advertise a
>>> higher limit that is enabled by an extension or version the server does not
>>> understand.
> It would, if it were present. The IESG is reviewing version -02 of the
> document, in which that text does not appear. (I see it's in your repo, so
> presumably the -03 version will address the issue I highlight).

My fault.  Sean prompted me to push out a new version, then IESG
reviews started coming in, so I held back.  That was the result of a
secdir review.

TLS mailing list

Reply via email to