> On Apr 12, 2018, at 2:44 PM, John Gilmore <g...@toad.com> wrote: > > Viktor, I believe you have confused a "could" with a "mandate".
As to this point, I'm not now and have never been confused about that. The present draft, as explained upthread, perhaps in too many ways and in too many words, offers no value to applications that don't mandate the use of the extension, if the application also excepts WebPKI, and the extension is optional, then a cost/benefit analysis shows that use of the DANE extension offers only complexity and no security benefit. Opportunistic use-cases of the present draft won't get deployed, they make no sense. -- Viktor. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls