On 4/12/18 6:55 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> If you'd like me to craft revised option (A) text, that includes a suitable
> caveat, I can try.
I'm okay with putting denial-of-existence in there as a should,
but I do feel strongly that pinning belongs in a separate document.
As I said earlier, I have a problem with putting features in protocols
that nobody intends to use. It's bad enough when it happens by
circumstance but doing it deliberately strikes me as a bad idea.
And while this may not be your problem, it's very much mine: this
kind of thing is bad for the IETF. It discourages participation
(and, ironically, implementation) and it slows the process down
further, with no clear benefit (getting back to the implementation
question). I've gotten an earful from several implementers about
this, and it concerns me.
Melinda
--
Software longa, hardware brevis
PGP fingerprint: 4F68 2D93 2A17 96F8 20F2
34C0 DFB8 9172 9A76 DB8F
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
