> On May 28, 2018, at 12:38 AM, Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> See my previous comment on why it was used, it was only because implementers
> needed something to put in their code while I waited for the registry draft to
> be published...
I am curious whether (given the rather recent assignment) there are any
shipping implementations of compression with 26 already baked in. If not, then
perhaps
TLS-LTS should get precedence.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
