Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> writes:
>As noted earlier, it's premature for TLS-LTS to request a code point because
>the enabling document has not yet been published,
And yet -compression was allocated a codepoint without this. This whole mess
was created because I asked for early allocation and was told to wait, which I
did [0], while -compression wasn't subject to the same requirements.
Peter.
[0] Meaning I didn't push the issue any further, however people were rolling
out deployments and we had to use some value, see my previous comments
on why 26 was used.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
