On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 7:10 PM, Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> writes: > > >As noted earlier, it's premature for TLS-LTS to request a code point > because > >the enabling document has not yet been published, > > And yet -compression was allocated a codepoint without this. Compression is a WG draft which met the standards for early allocation. This is not a WG draft, but will meet the new standard for regular allocation when the IANA document is published. This whole mess > was created because I asked for early allocation and was told to wait, > which I > did [0], while -compression wasn't subject to the same requirements. > I would say rather that this mess was created by your choosing to squat on a code point right in the middle of future allocations. -Ekr
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
