My recollection is that we would do a call for adoption, and that would lead to 
comments, and then I post an update.  If the comments are addressed adequately, 
then the update will be adopted, otherwise not.

Russ


> On Jul 26, 2018, at 8:16 PM, Martin Thomson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I think that we need a little more clarity on the goals before we talk
> about adoption for this.  I'm sorry if that message wasn't clear at
> the meeting.
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 8:06 AM Christopher Wood
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> The sense of the TLS@IETF102 room was that the WG should adopt
>> draft-housley-tls-tls13-cert-with-extern-psk as a WG item. This email
>> is to confirm this sense on list. If you would like for this draft to
>> become a WG document and you are willing to review it as it moves
>> through the process, then please let the list know by 2359UTC
>> 20180809.  If you are opposed to this being a WG document, please say
>> so (and say why).
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Chris, Joe and Sean
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> TLS mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to