Hello Mr Peter, Thank you for your reply. It was my first attempt to develop a protocol. Hence, the mistake. I hope to do better work next time.
Although PUF is not my idea, I would like to know if it is a good idea. I thought it was the future of IoT world. Should we invest time, money and energy in it ? Please advise. Thanks and Regards, Sankalp Bagaria. On Sun 17 Feb, 2019, 6:30 AM Peter Gutmann, <[email protected]> wrote: > Sankalp Bagaria <[email protected]> writes: > > >We propose that the server is authenticated using X509 certificate in a > TLS > >1.3 like protocol. The Server sends 32-byte Challenge. Client replies by > >sending 32-byte Response. > > Something very similar to this already exists in the form of CHAP/MSCHAP > over > PEAP/EAP-TLS/EAP-TTLS. It's supported by every Radius server and vast > numbers > (probably billions) of clients. To compete against this huge installed > base, any > new proposal would have to be pretty spectacular... > > Peter. >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
