+1 (I am not sure this is the best way to handle external PSK long term, but it seems like good way to address this issue for the moment without making changes to TLS 1.3)
-----Original Message----- From: TLS <[email protected]> on behalf of Melinda Shore <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, 9 April 2019 at 07:45 To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: draft-wood-tls-external-psk-importer On Tue, Apr 9, 2019, at 10:57, Sean Turner wrote: > At TLS@IETF104, there was consensus in the room to adopt > draft-wood-tls-external-psk-importer. This message is to confirm that > consensus. If you do not support adoption of > draft-wood-tls-external-psk-importer as WG item please say so by > 2359UTC on 22 April 2019 (and say why). I support adoption. Melinda -- Melinda Shore [email protected] Software longa, hardware brevis _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
