I guess we want Hold For Document Update? -Ben
On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 03:36:20PM -0700, RFC Errata System wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8448, > "Example Handshake Traces for TLS 1.3". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5720 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Martin Thomson <[email protected]> > > Section: GLOBAL > > Original Text > ------------- > 00 0d 00 20 00 1e 04 03 05 03 06 03 02 03 08 04 08 05 > 08 06 04 01 05 01 06 01 02 01 04 02 05 02 06 02 02 02 > > > > Corrected Text > -------------- > 00 0d 00 18 00 16 04 03 05 03 06 03 02 03 08 04 08 05 > 08 06 04 01 05 01 06 01 02 01 > > Notes > ----- > The traces all show DSA signature schemes in ClientHello messages. The use > of these is prohibited by RFC 8446. To be compliant, these would be removed. > > Note that this isn't a simple substitution as implied above. The length > fields on all of the messages would also need to be reduced by 8 in addition > to making the substitution. The value of the PSK binders used in the > resumption case in Section 4 would need to be recalculated also. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC8448 (draft-ietf-tls-tls13-vectors-07) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Example Handshake Traces for TLS 1.3 > Publication Date : January 2019 > Author(s) : M. Thomson > Category : INFORMATIONAL > Source : Transport Layer Security > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
