On Thu, Jun 27, 2019, at 11:33, Salz, Rich wrote: > No, let's stick with the interesting case before us because, well, it > shows a problem. We have a problem and lack of clarity in the > registries, which can even be misleading. Yes the spec is definitive, > and maybe a prolog in each TLS registry should state that. But > implementors and reviewers sometimes need a checklist.
Sure, but in this case, there is a potential for collateral. Do you think that is not an important consideration? _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
