On 9/18/2019 9:07 AM, Alissa Cooper via Datatracker wrote
Section 1:
s/servers rely on the Service Name Information (SNI) TLS extension/servers rely
on the Server Name Indication (SNI) TLS extension [RFC 6066]/
Yes of course.
Section 2.1:
Why is parental controls in quotes?
Removing the quotes, changing the text to
Content filtering by network operators or ISP blocking specific web sites
in order to implement, for example, parental controls, or to prevent
access
to phishing or other fraudulent web sites.
Privacy advocates worry many sites are blocked for entirely different
reasons than "protecting the children". The quotes were a leftover of
these worry. The expanded text only uses parental control as an example,
avoiding a dive in an unpleasant pool.
Section 2.2:
s/Encrypting the SNI now will complete this push/Encrypting the SNI completes
this push/
(for timelessness)
OK.
Section 2.3:
In the first paragraph I would suggest trying to use the present tense more so
that this still makes sense far in the future.
s/At the moment/At the time of this writing/
I am trying that, but there are two issues. The document itself is
designed to help define SNI encryption, but does not define the SNI
encryption solution, so deployment inevitably happens after this
document is published. Then, the replacement solutions are not deployed
yet. They are best described using conditional future.
-- Christian Huitema
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
