Hubert Kario <[email protected]> writes:
>Now, I don't have access to X9.62-2005, but there's a possibility of
>confusion.
>From X9.62-2005:
E.8 Digital Signatures
When a digital signature is represented with ASN.1, the digital signature
shall be ASN.1 encoded using the following syntax:
ECDSA-Sig-Value ::= SEQUENCE {
r INTEGER,
s INTEGER
}
So the SECG re/mis-definition is definitely the wrong one.
Peter.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
