Hi, I thought I would help to characterize some basic "crypto" bullying.
This kind of thing is not easy for every participant to deflect, so I thought I would share some email traffic in my inbox. thanks, Rob [me] > "And, as I wrote, I am not an expert in these matters. From what I do know, I think padding the buffer to the maximum likely size seems like a good idea." [respondent] > "Usually not a good idea to go with what “seems” like a good idea. Crypto is often not obvious" [me] > "I am totally ok with a brutal on-list takedown of my message. That would shake out truth, and that is good." [respondent] > "Shrug. Not from me, not this time :)" [me] > "It seems hard to argue against 256 characters for this use case. There isn't even an efficiency argument, since ClientHello messages are pretty small." thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
