Hiya, On 25/10/2019 16:22, Salz, Rich wrote: > I prefer an informative (not- normative) appendix of, like, 3 > sentences or so. > > This will need all the implementation and operational help it can > get, and scattering things across multiple teensy docs is not > helpful. >
I agree with Rich - if a bunch of TLS server code bases adopt this, it'd be better as an appendix to the ESNI spec. However, to help move things along, I submitted [1]. I'm happy to make sensible changes to that however suits other implementers, but that's what I've coded up for now. Cheers, S. [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farrell-tls-pemesni-00
0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
