One belated comment, editorial in nature:  The draft now uses the term "packet" 
in quite a few places. The older text uses datagram.  I suggest that this be 
normalized before the publication request is made.

On Tue, Nov 5, 2019, at 03:08, Sean Turner wrote:
> This WGLC has concluded.  I will complete my shepherd write-up and 
> forward this to the IESG once I have received the BCP 78 and 70 
> confirmations.
> 
> spt
> 
> > On Oct 13, 2019, at 21:13, Sean Turner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > This is the second working group last call for the "The Datagram Transport
> > Layer Security (DTLS) Protocol Version 1.3" draft available at
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-dtls13/. Please
> > review the document and send your comments to the list by 2359 UTC on
> > 28 October 2019.
> > 
> > Please note that we are now on at version -33. -30 was the subject of the
> > 1st WGLC and the WG should focus on changes introduced since -30
> > version.  Diffs between -30 and -33 can be found at:
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-tls-dtls13-30&url2=draft-ietf-tls-dtls13-33
> > 
> > Note the the GH repo for this draft can be found at:
> > https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Chris, Joe, and Sean
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to