The adoption call ended on Friday. There is support for adopting and working on this draft as a WG item. There was one voice of possible dissent, but it appears as if the rationale provided by the authors of this draft swayed them enough to not oppose adoption.
NOTE: Technically, we will formally adopt this draft (i.e., push the buttons in the datatracker) once the WG re-charter process completes successfully. Thanks, Chris, Joe, and Sean > On Nov 21, 2019, at 01:56, Sean Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > > At IETF 106 there was support for adoption of "Batch Signing for TLS" [0] as > a WG item. To confirm this on the list: if you believe that the TLS WG > should not adopt this as a WG item, then please let the chairs know by > posting a message to the TLS list by 2359 UTC 13 December 2019 (and say why). > > NOTE: > : If the consensus is that this draft should be adopted as a WG item, then > this will necessarily result in a WG rechartering discussions. We would have > gotten to this rechartering discussion anyway now that DTLS 1.3 is > progressing out of the WG. > > Thanks, > Chris, Joe, and Sean > > [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-davidben-tls-batch-signing/ _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
