Alissa: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Building on a point Barry made, I think it would be useful to distinguish in > the document whether this spec is experimental because we are waiting for > quantum computers to materialize, or whether it is experimental because > current > implementors want to gain more experience with it before standardization. That > way if it does come back at some future point on the standards track the > context for why it was experimental in the first place will be there.
There was a lot of discussion in the TLS WG, and several implementors wanted to gain more experience with the specification before producing a standards-track RFC. I am not sure that really helps if this document comes back in the future. > Please respond to the Gen-ART reviewer. I have done so. Russ _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
