On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 6:21 PM Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com> wrote: > > > - If the scope of a document can be continually expanded during last > call, it can be indefinitely postponed. > > > > No, the WG can get consensus on not expanding scope. >
That's true, but there's no need to stop if the expanded scope doesn't have consensus. > It’s not great that this came up with WGLC, but several folks in the WG > now recognize that this is an important use-case and feel it’s in-scope. > Not sure "several" is the correct term. There are some mailing list messages about the topic. thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
