On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 2:25 PM Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 21/02/2020 22:11, Watson Ladd wrote: > > > https://blog.cloudflare.com/towards-post-quantum-cryptography-in-tls/ > > https://blog.cloudflare.com/the-tls-post-quantum-experiment/ > > > > This was also presented at the NIST standardization workshop in October of > > 2019. > > Thanks. I read through [1]. It's fine work, but does not > convince me that this draft is ready to be an RFC before > the "winning" algs are known, as some have characteristics > that are quite different from the two that were tested > here. I maintain my position that adoption is fine but > finishing this before NIST are done is not.
How do these characteristics affect the proposal in the draft? And I doubt given the relevant timelines we would finish before NIST is done in any case. > > Cheers, > S. > > [1] > https://csrc.nist.gov/CSRC/media/Presentations/measuring-tls-key-exchange-with-post-quantum-kem/images-media/sullivan-session-1-paper-pqc2019.pdf > > > > > >> > >> Ta, > >> S. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
