The changes proposed by Viktor in [1] address my concern and I am happy
with those.

I am also fine to to have further considerations in another draft as the
current structure let this to be document be moved forward.

I think it is important we provide means to minimize the resource involved,
and this includes the possibility to re-use ticket.

I am wondering if more text should be provided for:
new_session = n > 1
resumption = m  > 1

Yours,
Daniel

[1]
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequest/pull/18/commits/3dd8be998435fb54bbf78369449099aca217347f

On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 11:24 AM Sean Turner <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> Based on Tommy Pauly’s suggestion [0], Joe and I believe that the best way
> for us to get to the place where we can declare rough consensus is to:
>
> * Consider the PR: [1].  This PR explains that when racing connections,
> the client will not necessarily know the number of tickets it will
> “consume”, so it should either have enough tickets for two subsequent
> handshake resumptions; or else use fewer tickets but potentially run out.
>
> * Consider adoption of an individual draft that describes an extension for
> hinting ticket reuse. This draft will also discuss the use cases around
> ticket reuse.
>
> Obviously, the rationale here is to progress this relatively simple draft,
> but allow the reuse discussion to continue. Again, we believe this allows
> us to declare rough consensus and avoid any deadlocks.
>
> Please let us know your thoughts on the PR, which (assuming the PR gets
> consensus) we plan to ask the authors to merge sometime around 6 March.
>
> Thanks,
> Joe and Sean
>
> [0] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/fOmUYve5DLomjx3-Df9xQy0bocg/
> [1] https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequest/pull/17
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>


-- 
Daniel Migault
Ericsson
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to