I think this is an important protocol feature and I'm in favour of adoption. I'm also happy to invest cycles to bring it to fruition.
I agree with Martin that the currently defined mechanism is simplistic, and I expect it to change substantially. Hopefully, we can reuse at least some of the good stuff that has been produced in QUIC in this same area. Cheers! On 01/08/2020, 01:55, "TLS on behalf of Sean Turner" <tls-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: > > Just a reminder that this WG adoption call is still ongoing. > > spt > > > On Jul 22, 2020, at 14:55, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > The authors of "Return Routability Check for DTLS 1.2 and DTLS 1.3" > > have asked for adoption of their draft as a WG item. Please state > > whether you support adoption of this draft as a WG item by posting a > > message to the TLS list by 2359 UTC 06 August 2020. Please include > > any additional information that is helpful in understanding your > > position. > > > > NOTE: We discussed this draft at IETF 105 in connection with > > draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id [0]. The plan at the time was to > > progress draft-tschofenig-tls-dtls-rrc after we progressed > > draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id. That time is now. > > > > Thanks, Chris, Joe, and Sean > > > > [0] > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/materials/slides-105-tls-sessb-cid-00 IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
