* I don't have a strong opinion on whether to require a minimal encoding, but if we're not going to use QUIC's encoding as-is, then I would rather stick with the existing scheme, which has twice as large a range for the 1 byte encoding and is thus more compact for a range of common cases.
I was only thinking code re-use, but it’s only a couple of instructions so this is fine with me. Leave it as-is.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
