> This is a reminder to keep discourse here courteous and respectful.

I am hoping this comment was not directed at me.
I find myself biting my tongue frequently, but will
try to do a better job of it going forward in any
case.

> We want this mailing list to be maximally useful for all readers. 
> Dismissive or otherwise disrespectful replies are counter to that goal. 
> Please check out the official Code of Conduct [1] for more information.
> 
> Michael, since your question is more related to the cryptographic 
> primitives used by TLS than the protocol itself, the chairs encourage 
> you to continue this discussion on the CFRG mailing list [2]. 

I am not really interested in pursuing this further.
If the cryptographers want to run with it, that's
fine.  I'm more of a protocol implementer person
and will refocus my attention there, or not, haven't
decided.

Mike


> Thanks,
> Chris, on behalf of the chairs
> 
> [1] https://ietf.org/about/administration/policies-procedures/code-of-conduct/
> [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to