Thank you for your review, Nagendra and finding several nits. We'll correct them.
Best regards, Kathleen On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 4:21 PM Nagendra Nainar via Datatracker < [email protected]> wrote: > Reviewer: Nagendra Nainar > Review result: Ready > > Hi, > > I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's > ongoing > effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These > comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects > of > the IETF drafts per guidelines in RFC5706. > > Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included > in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs > should > treat these comments just like any other last call comments. > > Version: draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-09 > > Overall Summary: > > This draft is deprecating TLS v1.0 and TLSv1.1 to reduce the opportunity > for > misconfiguration or security attack. > > The draft clarifies that these (to be obsoleted) versions of TLS must not > be > negotiated and further clarifies that the connection must be terminated > upon > receiving such version in the initial negotiation. > > Overall this is a well-written document with clear clarification on any > backward compatibility requirement. > > I just noticed a couple of nits some of which were already mentioned in > other > reviews as well. I am including the same here for completeness: > > 1. s/waas defined/was defined > 2. Some text appears to use DTLS while other use (D)TLS. I think it is > better > to use one common way of defining it. > > Thanks, > Nagendra > > > -- Best regards, Kathleen
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
