Thank you for your careful review, the change looks good to me.

Best regards,
Kathleen

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 10:07 AM Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]>
wrote:

> LGTM.
>
> Regards,
> Rob
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stephen Farrell <[email protected]>
> > Sent: 19 January 2021 14:28
> > To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]>; The IESG <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> > [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [TLS] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-
> > oldversions-deprecate-11: (with COMMENT)
> >
> >
> > Hiya,
> >
> > On 19/01/2021 11:05, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message----- From: iesg <[email protected]> On
> > >> Behalf Of Stephen Farrell Sent: 12 January 2021 21:35 To: Rob
> > >> Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]>; The IESG <[email protected]> Cc:
> > >> [email protected];
> > >> [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [TLS] Robert
> > >> Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls- oldversions-deprecate-11:
> > >> (with COMMENT)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Hiya,
> > >>
> > >> On 12/01/2021 18:14, Robert Wilton via Datatracker wrote:
> > >>> Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
> > >>> draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-11: No Objection
> > >>>
> > >>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to
> > >>> all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free
> > >>> to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-
> > >> criteria.html
> > >>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found
> > >>> here:
> > >>>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate/
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> COMMENT:
> > >>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > Thank you for purging the old versions of TLS.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for trudging through it! :-)
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> There is one sentence in the abstract that I found surprising (if
> > >>> it is
> > >> right).
> > >>>
> > >>> The abstract states: "TLSv1.2 has been the recommended version
> > >>> for IETF protocols since 2008, providing sufficient time to
> > >>> transition away from older versions."
> > >>>
> > >>> Should this be "minimum recommended version"?  Otherwise, I
> > >>> don't
> > >> understand
> > >>> why the recommended version of TLS is 1.2 rather than 1.3 (given
> > >>> that
> > >> the TLS
> > >>> 1.2 RFC is marked as obsolete).
> > >>
> > >> I see what you mean.
> > >>
> > >> I guess s/has been/became/ would do it? The point isn't so much
> > >> what the current recommended version is/was but more that it's been
> > >> a dozen years since it was TLSv1.1.
> > > [RW]
> > >
> > > Yes, s/has been/became/ helps, but I still think that it implies that
> > > TLV 1.2 is the current recommended version of TLS.
> > >
> > > Perhaps something along the lines of:
> > >
> > > TLSv1.2 became the recommended version for IETF protocols in 2008
> > > (now obsoleted by TLSv1.3 in 2018), providing sufficient time to
> > > transition away from older versions."
> >
> > Sure. I did more or less that in the repo - [1] with
> > diff vs. -11 at [2]
> >
> > Cheers,
> > S.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://github.com/tlswg/oldversions-deprecate/blob/master/draft-ietf-tls-
> > oldversions-deprecate.txt
> > [2]
> >
> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-
> > 11.txt&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tlswg/oldversions-
> > deprecate/master/draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate.txt
> >
> > >
> > > Regards, Rob
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Cheers, S.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list
> > >>> [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
> > >>>
>


-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to