On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 4:31 PM Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hiya, > > On 16/02/2021 21:31, Christopher Wood wrote: > > That's true, but I'd personally prefer one tracking vector to two. > > This structure also better aligns with other proposed use cases for > > HPKE configurations. I also don't see an immediate need for > > flexibility in this value given that there are extensions in > > ECHConfigContents already. > FWIW, I think one octet is ok. > > I'd prefer zero and forced trial decryption I think but > living with 1 is doable. > > Yet another value to manage (a multi-octet server chosen > config id) How is it any harder to manage a multi-octet server-chosen value than a single-octet server-chosen value? -Ekr
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
