> > You may claim that my environment does not represent yours. Sure, > > fine. Similarly, *yours does NOT represent mine*. > > I'm not telling you what to do.
By making a statement "this solution works" without any qualifiers, you essentially are. The truth is - it works well for *some* environments, including yours. I've some where it would work too. Unfortunately, I *also* have plenty where it cannot work. > . . . . . It's reasonable to suspect that even someone I > know and I know is smart may not have all the relevant details. My point is - we *both* may not have all the relevant details about each other's environments. Which is why I absolutely disagreed with your "this solution works" statement. > Besides, your > > >>> With all due respect, *absolutely not*. > > followed by no explanation, seems like much more likely to be intended > to cause offense than "I'm not sure what it is you're imagining" > followed by an explanation. I took it at face value however, and > followed up. What a crime. ;-) OK, touche.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
