On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 3:57 PM Jonathan Hoyland <[email protected]> wrote: > > IIUC a channel binding (in this context) provides a unique "name" for a > channel. > In the case where two distinct protocols running over the top of TLS use this > definition, they will both get the same channel binding.
This draft is using exporter instead since channel bindings died an ignominious death at the hands of Karthikeyan Bhargavan and his students. Because it uses exporters and registers a use in the registry, the other exporter values will be distinct. Exporters are stronger, so I think this is less relevant. Sincerely, Watson Ladd -- Astra mortemque praestare gradatim _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
