Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-tls-dtls13-41: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-dtls13/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [ section 4.4 ] * "respectively" -> "respectively." * Could a DTLS implementation packetize to a min-MTU for an IP version and avoid all pMTU issues? Such a strategy would probably be poor for IPv4 but might be acceptable for IPv6 communications. [ section 4.5.3 ] * "MUST NOT used" -> "MUST NOT be used" [ section 5.8.4 ] * "NOT have send" -> "NOT send", I think [ section 6 ] * "which are needed to encrypt to decrypt"? _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
