Agreed on all counts. RFC Editor, this phrase appears twice in Section 1.1 -- do you know if the inline errata tooling will do something useful with the Original/Corrected text as currently shown, or should I extract a larger snippet so that both instances can be done together?
Thanks, Ben On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 03:03:14PM -0700, RFC Errata System wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8996, > "Deprecating TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6492 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Martin Thomson <[email protected]> > > Section: 1.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > ServerHello.Random > > Corrected Text > -------------- > ServerHello.random > > Notes > ----- > Very pedantic, but RFC 8446 uses all lowercase for "random" to match the > grammar. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC8996 (draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-12) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Deprecating TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 > Publication Date : March 2021 > Author(s) : K. Moriarty, S. Farrell > Category : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE > Source : Transport Layer Security > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
