Yup, we she it add this. Just so you know, the buck stops with me here :) I've been meaning to build an ECH status page but haven't gotten around to it.
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:12 PM Rob Sayre <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:09 PM Christopher Patton <cpatton= > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> (In case it helps someone else...) Is there any way that the >>> HTTP response content could differ if ECH succeeded or not? >>> I'm seeing the same 302 response in either case I think but >>> maybe there's some specific pathname or something that'd >>> result in different HTTP responses? >>> >> >> That's right, we're just redirecting most HTTP requests to the spec right >> now. >> > > FWIW, I found this confusing as well. I'd expect a 200 "It worked!" > response if ECH interoperated. > > thanks, > Rob > >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
