Hi Rob, Thank you for your review and suggestion. Your review is tracked here:
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id/issues/104 cheers, t On 19/04/2021, 11:34, "Robert Wilton via Datatracker" <[email protected]> wrote: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Hi, > > I'm no DTLS expert, but I found the concepts/explanation in this > document easy to follow. > > I was slightly confused by the requirement to encode the length in > variable length CIDs, and had to read the relevant text a second time. > As a suggestion, it might help if these two sentences were reworded > the other way round: > > OLD: > Implementations that want to use > variable-length CIDs are responsible for constructing the CID in > such a way that its length can be determined on reception. Note > that there is no CID length information included in the record > itself. > > NEW: > Since the CID length information is not included in the record itself, > implementations that want to use ... <as before>. > > One minor question. In the contributors, I noted that Jana is listed > as being associated with Google, but it might be worth checking if > that is still accurate. > > Regards. > Rob IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
