Even if linking this in updates implied confidence (though I don't think it does), TLS alread implies confidence in its own EKM mechanism. I don't believe this document expands on that. For example, it does not detail any particular use of channel binding.
—Sam On Sat, Oct 2, 2021, at 13:12, Eric Rescorla wrote: > I want to be clear that I don't think this is about credit. My concern > is purely about accurately reflecting the level of confidence one > should have in this mechanism. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
