On Thursday, 7 October 2021 20:37:22 CEST, Yoav Nir wrote:
OK, so now my response:
I agree with the first and second comments. About the third,
what I meant was that a supported flag that is supposed to
appear only in CH appears instead and CR, or more likely, a flag
that should appear in EE apears in SH instead.
But I think the best way to resolve the issue is to remove the
bullet point list and the last sentence before them, IOW: remove
the examples.
Clients aborting on unrecognised flags in SH or EE is expected, that's what
already happens for normal extensions, but yes, it's too strong for CH.
Maybe
also NST.
--
Regards,
Hubert Kario
Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team
Web: www.cz.redhat.com
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
